Achieving social balance is the key to maintaining a just and stable society

Many people believe we are heading for a society where the rich few will dominate a huge number of poverty stricken people, as this has already been happening, particularly over the last century, and has been exacerbated by the 2 world wars. However, contrary to the common view, this cannot go on, because nature requires balance in order to survive, and as this continues it will reach the point of imbalance where it collapses, possibly with catastrophic consequences, I say "possibly" because, once a trend is recognized, disaster can be averted by taking action to restore balance, and thereby avert any such dangers. Hence lets build a better planet, not by arguing with the ignorant, but by embracing those with radical ideas for seeking improvement, not for themselves, but for society as a whole, and helping them, supporting them and working with them in order to make it happen. That way we will all enjoy a better, more harmonious, peaceful, and most importantly stable and balanced world well into the future. This will not happen without it's challenges, and in particular the complacency that develops for those in cosy positions that seem to become more oblivious of what's going on in the world around them. Help them get in touch with what's going on in the real world outside their cocoons and they may begin to understand.

With the recent advent of pervasive IT/Internet, we now have the realisation of the "big brother" concept that had been feared by many before we got here, but they hadn't (at the time) thought of the power that enables the smaller communities "little brother" groups that are the ultimate force for good, and can contribute, and help create the conditions for us to move forward in achieving this balance we are seeking.

Is Google Street View really covering all public areas with openness?

I'm a real fan of Google street view to find ones way around an area before they go driving there. It's great to feel that you know your way around having never even been there before. And what's more it's an excellent educational tool at showing various people round the world what Cities/Towns/Countryside looks like in far away lands and familiarising one with other countries that they may contemplate visiting etc..

However, one notable absence in many of my random search endeavors is how a chunk of public space becomes inaccessible to the viewer. I thought at first that this was some kind of accident, i.e The google video footage got corrupted, or the photographer switched off his camera momentarily as they passed a specific area. But, upon further research it appears to me like many of these omissions are entirely deliberate. In fact so much so, I have reached the conclusion that certain parties may not want their building to be shown on Google maps, and have exerted their financial muscle with Google to make sure that this happened. Hence, I've decided to document all of the areas where I notice this "aberration" happen and ask you the reader to share any you find, so we can create a global list of areas around the world "not shown" on Google maps for whatever reason (that can be investigated later). So here goes, here are the first ones I've come up with:

London:

• Woodside Park Tube Station on the Northern Line (and surrounding areas)  -Can't even get as far as Holden Ave, which is a distance from the Station. Only notable landmarks in the forbidden area are a Jewish Synagogue, a Nursery and a School.
• 
  
• 
  

Are the Worlds banks quietly, or secretly acquiring all of the worlds real tangible assets?

Here's the game: The banks are able to issue money from nothing, but they decide not to for the large part, as they need to covertly "asset strip" the public, using the money system as a smoke screen for doing so.  How does this work?: The recent example of the run on the banks in 2007 is a good example:  So they loan millions of people money to purchase a home (a mortgage), even though the people borrowing the money most likely have no chance of ever paying that loan off (and if so, all the better for the banks!!). In fact, this is what happened, simply because they loaned to people who didn't even have fulltime jobs, or were even unemployed, so foreclosure was inevitable.

Was Marx's version of Communism a plot on society, so that its lack of credibility could somehow validate Capitalism?

Marx believed that the government would have to control all means of production so that no one could outdo anyone else by making more money. Unfortunately, that proves to this day to be more difficult than he might have realized.  - That's because the notion of "money" itself was the root issue to the solutions he was proposing!!.. 

The logic of the current Global Money system just doesn't add up!!

If we take all of the worlds companies, all of the worlds resources, and put them together as World Inc. (One humongous Company that comprises the world, and owns all of the Companies currently trading, as well as all of the worlds liabilities, including all of the healthcare, unemployment, poverty, global disasters etc.. ). I'm sure the business of World Inc. would be running at a huge loss. Hence if you then amalgamate all of the current worlds currencies into one Global currency and do the sums, some "entity" is making a lot of money out of World Inc. loaning them money, for which they will never be able to pay back!!!..

It appears that the worlds current money system is totally skewed, and setup in faviour of a small minority of source providers of money to the world where they are slowly paralyzing all of the world economies for their own gain. No rocket science required here,.. all we need to do, is to adopt a new system developed using a modern scientific like approach, that actually works to the benefit of the whole of mankind!. So ok apes, you can stop laughing now!!!

Ireland - An attractive location for my holiday / vacation this summer? (Summer 2014)

With all of the horrendous weather we have had this winter in Ireland (and the UK in general), it would not be surprising if it was followed by a glorious summer. And whenever this happens, there's no better place to be than on your hols in the many beautiful places that are worth exploring, especially in Ireland where there should be the additional advantage of being able to do it on a budget as well!.. From the ring of Kerry to the Glens of Antrim, there's so much beauty and so many places to chill the list is just huge.

However, during the Celtic tiger period in particular, Ireland was viewed as an expensive place to visit, whereas now, with so many businesses just happy to stay afloat, there must also be a huge attraction with the low cost of holidaying around such beauty.  The Irish governments policy of applying a 9% vat rate on most things holiday related should also help in keeping the costs down. In addition the Euro has been quite weak, and is not expected to gain much over the summer, with most Euro nations struggling to maintain their economies.  So it all makes perfect to organize your holiday to Ireland this summer!..

Demolition of Ghost Estates in Ireland, as well as the land reclamation is in the domain of the sources of the initial mis-investments

The recent news in Ireland that the state is likely to foot the bill for the demolition of around 40 ghost estates around the country should simply NOT be the case.

There is no need for anyone to "foot the bill" for any such previous error of judgement by whoever was responsible for these ghost estates. The key point is to look at the issue of how they were created in the first place:

Financial institutions (lets call them "banks") lent out money on a profit driven basis, with little regard for any overall long-term strategic development plan. These properties where then built with all this leaveraged capital, and once the inevitable end of the boom happened, this same capital dried up, preventing these estates from being completed. If we can just isolate "the banking system" as a source of capital, then what they do (in conjunction with a central bank) is issue the money to be raised to finance these projects, and once the projects are successfully completed, and a return is obtained on this investment (ideal scenario for the banks), then they get a return on REAL equity, i.e. Work/Building/Human activity, in return for issuing capital that was essentially generated from nothing.

However, because these projects FAILED and the return was not yielded, all the banks have to do is write the investment off, so that no one has to fork out payment for anything that was never realized in the first place. Hence, the cost of demolishing these failed estates forms part of the overall cost of these projects, and is therefore added to the projects overall cost that is to be included in the write off amount. In addition to this the cost of putting the land back to some normality (or where it was before the projects begun would also be encompassed in the overall cost of these failed projects. Once this is achieved we are back to point zero from the projects inception.